conflict of horizons
if inspector jabert, eponine, cosette and marius are to speak about jean valjean - no doubt they will come up with conflicting images. facets and information about the person's character may even be confused as each one lay claim on a certain personality. a reader/listener may be tempted to say - jean valjean is essentially schismatic, a contested persona - therefore it is not wise to ever bother asking about him.
who is the true jean valjean? yes you may ask that but such query on a literary character is irrelevant. Fiction cares not about questions of factual truth! it is not lying either, however. if the characters speak about another character, they may not be in the realm of what you call truth, and yet they cannot be called liars either. but that being the point - it is unwise to not bother about the character of jean valjean for carrying schismatic and contesting perspectives. if at all the characters in presenting him to us are inviting us to know who he is.
Mark Twain spoke about a terrible character in what some claim as sacred writings. Twain's words are limited in that he reads the different accounts as if they are a slate of zeroes and ones in a binary logic board. different writers came up with conflicting things? what's new with that? i bet if we ask his mother, friend and enemy to write Twain's elegy then we'll have the same thing too. the last writer may not even give us an elegy at all! but this time it's no longer in the realm of literary characters for we're in a wilder and more complicated terrain. should we not bother with who he is? should tom sawyer and huck finn be relegated to rotting bookshelves and not be read ever again? of course not, these are all invitations for us to know him more...
who is the true jean valjean? yes you may ask that but such query on a literary character is irrelevant. Fiction cares not about questions of factual truth! it is not lying either, however. if the characters speak about another character, they may not be in the realm of what you call truth, and yet they cannot be called liars either. but that being the point - it is unwise to not bother about the character of jean valjean for carrying schismatic and contesting perspectives. if at all the characters in presenting him to us are inviting us to know who he is.
Mark Twain spoke about a terrible character in what some claim as sacred writings. Twain's words are limited in that he reads the different accounts as if they are a slate of zeroes and ones in a binary logic board. different writers came up with conflicting things? what's new with that? i bet if we ask his mother, friend and enemy to write Twain's elegy then we'll have the same thing too. the last writer may not even give us an elegy at all! but this time it's no longer in the realm of literary characters for we're in a wilder and more complicated terrain. should we not bother with who he is? should tom sawyer and huck finn be relegated to rotting bookshelves and not be read ever again? of course not, these are all invitations for us to know him more...
